Dubreuil v. Witt
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether, in this legal malpractice action tried to the court, the trial court’s knowledge of the standard of care and of what constitutes a breach of that standard obviated the plaintiffs burden to present expert testimony regarding the defendant’s breach of the standard of care. The named defendant, Otto P. Witt, 1 appeals, following our grant of certification, 2 from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment for the plaintiffs, Alphonse T. Dubreuil and Marilyn B. Dubreuil, 3 rendered after a trial to the court.…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Paul v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Tracy v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Stohlts v. GilkinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Vanliner Insurance v. FayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Grimm v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Dixon v. BROMSON AND REINERConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Saye v. HoweConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.