Greer v. Heiser
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from, District Court of Douglas Cowrd/y.
1Opinion of the Court
Beed, O.
This was a suit instituted in November, 1887, by appellee filing a bill or petition asking that a general decree made and entered of record on the 10th day of December, 1883, establishing the priorities and appropriations of water in. the different irrigating ditches in water district No. 8 be amended, and that the irrigating ditch of plaintiff (appellee) be decreed entitled to priority over the ditch of appellant, known as ditch No. 82, and the “ McCracken ditch,” and ditch No. 83, known as the “ Smith ditch.”
It appears that, at the time the respective rights of the .different…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Farmers' High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Thomas v. GuiraudSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Tucker v. ParksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Montrose Canal Co. v. Loutsenhizer Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Crippen v. X. Y. Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Broad Run Investment Co. v. Deuel & Snyder Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Tuckerman v. CurrierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Lindsey v. McClureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.