United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. Carlisle Power Transmission Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this action, Plaintiffs seek to compel arbitration of labor-relations disputes with Defendant Carlisle Power Transmission Products, Inc. (“Carlisle”). Carlisle has moved to dismiss, arguing that Plaintiffs released their claims against it and, accordingly, it has no obligation to arbitrate Plaintiffs’ claims. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the Motion. Moreover, because the Court concludes, as a matter of law, that the parties’ disputes are arbitrable, the Court will sua sponte grant summary judgment on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Joan Chason ALFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC. and Don L. Harris, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- moses.com Securities, Inc. v. Comprehensive Software Systems, Inc. William W. Simpson Southwest Securities, Inc. David Glatstein David ZeleniakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Jason Bercovitch v. Baldwin School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jann v. Interplastic Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Kelley v. Eide Bailly, LLP (In re Petters Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2012