Legal Opinion
Jann v. Interplastic Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 7, 2009No. Civ. 09-721 (RHK/JJK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Brenda Jann has sued her former employer, Interplastic Corporation (“Interplastic”), asserting claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn.Stat. § 363A.01 et seq. Interplastic now moves to compel arbitration. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the Motion.
BACKGROUND
Jann previously worked for Interplastic as a receptionist. (Compl. ¶ 5.) She suffers…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Green v. Supershuttle International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Meskill v. GGNSC Stillwater Greeley LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Rosemann v. SigillitoDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
- Bakas v. Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Claussen v. American Family Life Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.