Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. North River Insurance Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] North River Insurance d/b/a Crum & Forster Insurance (Crum & Forster), the workers’ compensation carrier for the City of Yankton, South Dakota (City), appeal the summary judgment granted to Rodney and Marlys Kaiser (Kaisers) declaring that Crum & Forster have no sub-rogation right to proceeds from a separate underinsured motorist policy purchased by Rodney Kaiser’s employer, City. We reverse.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Rodney Kaiser (Rodney) was employed as a volunteer fireman with City. On March 17, 1996, while responding to a grass fire,- Rodney was severely injured when he was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Walther v. KPKA Meadowlands Ltd. PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Johnson v. Rapid City Softball Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Weiss v. Van NormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. National Sun Industries, Inc. v. South Dakota Farm Bureau Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fryer v. KranzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pettry v. Rapid City Area School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Luze v. New Fb Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Milligan v. WaldoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sharon Moad, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas Moad, and as Personal Representative on Behalf of Travis Moad and Heather Johnson v. Dakota Truck Underwriters, Risk Administrative Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API