Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Rapid City Softball Ass'n

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1994No. 18269PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Injured softball player filed a complaint against Rapid City Softball Association and Rapid City alleging negligence. Circuit Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment because the South Dakota Recreational Use Statutes precluded liability and player signed a release. Player appeals. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

On April 21, 1989, Darci Johnson (Johnson) signed up to play softball with the Arrow Bonding Outlaws. As required by the Rapid City Softball Association (Association), she signed a roster and paid her $15.00 player fee. A copy of the roster is attached to this…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lamp v. First National Bank of GarretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Garreans Ex Rel. Garreans v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Miller v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Copeland v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Julson v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API