Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Matthews

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 12, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Ralph Matthews appeals from an order of the Superior Court awarding the defendant Joan Matthews attorney’s fees incurred in defending several preliminary motions and from the exclusion of an *1074expert’s testimony at the hearing on preliminary motions. We find that there was not a final judgment from which the plaintiff could appeal and the orders did not fall within any recognized exceptions to the final judgment rule. We also determine that the appeal is frivolous and accordingly impose treble costs and attorney’s fees against plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to M.R. Civ.P. 76(f).

I

Plaintif…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Corder v. CorderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Tibbetts v. TibbettsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Northeast Investment Co. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Auburn Harpswell Ass'n v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Fern Const. Co., Inc. v. BinnallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Criscuolo v. Mauro Motors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Folsom v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API