Legal Opinion

Folsom v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 23, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Larry Folsom (Folsom) appeals from a judgment for the defendant, The Great At lantic & Pacific Tea Company (A & P), entered by the Superior Court, Aroostook County, after a jury trial. Folsom claims the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment. We also determine that the appeal is frivolous and accordingly impose treble costs and attorney’s fees against plaintiffs counsel pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 76(f).

I

Folsom, a self-employed truck driver, filed a complaint against A & P claiming damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him as a proximate result…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cuthbertson v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Kirkpatrick v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Paper Realty Corp. v. St. HilaireSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  2. St. Hilaire v. St. HilaireSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API