Ex parte Karish
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Hudson, J., Orangeburg, September, 1889. Petitions for chattel exemptions under the homestead laws, filed by Jacob Karish and by W. S. Pearlstein, defendants in the action of J. Regenstein & Co. against Pearlstein & Karish. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice McIver.
It appears that appellants were copartners in trade, each interested to the extent of one-half, and becoming embarrassed, executed an assignment of what purported to be the whole of their property for the benefit of all of their *438creditors who should accept the provisions thereof in full satisfaction of their demands. The action above stated was instituted for the purpose, amongst other things, of setting aside said assignment as fraudulent and void, and for the appointment of a receiver. That action resulted in a judgment setting…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Jensen v. WiersmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Dennis v. Kass & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928