Jeronique Cunningham v. Stuart Hudson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
An Ohio jury convicted Jeronique Cunningham of two murders and sentenced him to death. After unsuccessfully pursuing post-conviction relief in the Ohio state courts, Cunningham filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the federal district court. The district court denied his petition. He appeals based on seven claims of error, two concerning ineffective assistance of counsel, and others concerning juror bias, jury voir dire error, jury instructions, a Brady violation, and prose-cutorial misconduct. This opinion addresses only his claim of juror bias based on evidence that at the…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by52 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Cedric Carter v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- James P. Frazier v. Charlotte JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- State v. CunninghamOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Group v. RobinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.