Legal Opinion
Bolf v. Berklich
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 25, 1975No. 5-73 Civ. 24PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HEANEY, District Judge (Sitting by Designation).
This matter arises out of a mechanics lien foreclosure action first brought in state court and subsequently removed by the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1444 to the United States District Court. The critical issue is whether the mechanics lien asserted by the plaintiffs has priority over a mortgage interest held by the United States through its agency, the Small Business Administration (SBA). The United States has moved for summary judgment under Rule 56 and the case is before the Court on a set of stipulated facts.
At the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Small Business Administration v. McClellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kloster-Madsen, Inc. v. Tafi's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- W. T. Jones and Company, Incorporated, and Noland Company, Inc., and Marvin Moseley v. Foodco Realty, Inc., and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Ault v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Ore & Chemical Corp. v. Stinnes Interoil, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Hasbrouck v. TexacoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ford Mall Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992