Legal Opinion
Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 14, 1981No. 80-3160PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Eleven “independent” Texaco service station operators (appellants) charged their supplier, Texaco, Inc., (appellee), with price discrimination in violation of section 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a). Treble damages were sought under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15. The jury returned a verdict in appellants’ favor. The district court, concluding that the verdict had been infected by erroneous jury instructions, granted appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (J.N. O.V.). We reverse and remand for a new trial. We affirm,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Wells Real Estate, Inc. v. Greater Lowell Board of RealtorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Texaco Inc. v. HasbrouckSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jesus Zuniga v. United Can Company and Driver-Salesmen, Produce Workers, and Helpers, Local 588, Retail Delivery DriversCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.