Moorman v. Arthur
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from decree of circuit court of city of Danville, rendered May 26,1891, in two chancery causes heard together; in the first ¥m. A. Moorman and others being complainants and T. J. Arthur and others being defendants, and iu the second Wm, A. Moorman and others being complainants and the town of Danville and others being defendants. The circuit court dismissed the bills and the complainants appealed. Opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtFauhtleroy, J.
In an elaborate and exhaustive opinion in writing, filed in the cause and made part of the decree appealed from, the judge of the said court reviews all the law and the evidence in the records so fully, so ably, and conclusively, upon every point of law and fact involved in the causes at issue, that it is the judgment of this court, after mature consideration of the whole *457of the records brought under review by this appeal, to adopt the said opinion of the said judge of the circuit court of the city of Danville as the opinion of this court, and to affirm the decree appealed from, for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cook v. TullisSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ray v. NorseworthySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Lamar's Ex'or v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
- Beecher v. Wilson, Burns & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hayden v. DannenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Jenkins v. TriceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Dillard v. CollinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
- Kellow v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.