D.A.R., Inc. v. Sheffer
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing the plaintiffs complaint for a partnership accounting. The order was based on the defendants’ assertion that the action was commenced beyond the applicable statute of limitation. We agree and affirm the dismissal order.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 14, 1997, D.A.R., Inc., an Idaho corporation and attorney in fact for Dale Rudzik, filed a complaint seeking an accounting relating to a business in which he, his sister, Rosemary Rudzik Sheffer, and their mother, Anne Rudzik, were partners. The partnership, formed in 1983, was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ticor Title Co. v. StanionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Rodriguez v. Department of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Carter v. Gateway Parks LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Lawrence v. HutchinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.