Legal Opinion
Merz v. Oftedal
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1966No. 40,165PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal. The issue is whether the orders here for review are appealable under either or both of the following provisions of Minn. St. 605.09:
“An appeal may be taken to the supreme court:
“(d) From an order involving the merits of the action or some part thereof;
“(h) Except as otherwise provided by statute, from the final order or *402judgment affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding, provided that the appeal must be taken within the time limited for appeal from an order.”
These proceedings were…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Donarski v. LardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Raymond v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Tompkins v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cucchiarella v. KolodziegSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969