Legal Opinion

Merz v. Oftedal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1966No. 40,165PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal. The issue is whether the orders here for review are appealable under either or both of the following provisions of Minn. St. 605.09:

“An appeal may be taken to the supreme court:
“(d) From an order involving the merits of the action or some part thereof;
“(h) Except as otherwise provided by statute, from the final order or *402judgment affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding, provided that the appeal must be taken within the time limited for appeal from an order.”

These proceedings were…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Donarski v. LardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Raymond v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Tompkins v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cucchiarella v. KolodziegSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API