Legal Opinion
Neptune Research v. Teknics Indus.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 24, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
235 N.J. Super. 522 (1989)
563 A.2d 465
NEPTUNE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TEKNICS INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS, INC., AND TEKNICS SALES CORPORATION, BOTH NEW JERSEY CORPORATIONS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 19, 1989.
Decided August 24, 1989.
Before Judges KING, BRODY and ASHBEY.
Samuel D. Bornstein argued the cause for appellants.
Albert B. Jeffers argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.
This is a commercial dispute arising from the sale of a specialized…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ross Systems v. Linden Dari-Delite, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Ramirez v. AutosportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Miller and Sons Bakery Co. v. SelikowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Koolvent Aluminum Awning Co. of NJ v. SperlingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tahisha Roach v. Bm Motoring, Llc(077125)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- LINAN-FAYE CONST. CO. v. Housing Authority of City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Marilyn Flanzman v. Jenny Craig, Inc.(082207)(Bergen County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020
- PRISTINE PHARMA CORPORATION, ETC. VS. CISPHARMA, INC. (L-1112-13, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- Tahisha Roach v. Bm Motoring, Llc(077125)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017