Legal Opinion

Tahisha Roach v. Bm Motoring, Llc(077125)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 9, 2017No. A-69-15PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Solomon

Plaintiffs Emelia Jackson and Tahisha Roach purchased used cars from BM Motoring, LLC, and Federal Auto Brokers, Inc., which do business as BM Motor Cars (collectively, BM). Each plaintiff signed an identical Dispute Resolution Agreement (DRA) as part of the transaction. The DRA provided for arbitration “in accordance with the rules” of the American Arbitration Association (AAA), “before a single arbitrator, who shall be a retired judge or attorney.”

After Jackson purchased her ear, she filed an arbitration demand against BM with the AAA. Despite repeated requests by the AAA, BM did not…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. Patricia Atalese v. U.S. Legal Services Group, L.P. (072314)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. Wilson v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Kernahan v. Home Warranty Adm'r of Fla., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  2. Mall Chevrolet Inc v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  3. ORP Surgical v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  4. Flanzman v. Jenny Craig, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. Spano v. V & J National Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API