Legal Opinion

Pierce v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 10, 2000No. 25043PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

George M. Pierce, II (respondent) entered a plea of nolo contendere to a charge of using his official position or office for financial gain, and was fined $700. Respondent did not appeal his conviction or sentence. A circuit judge granted post-conviction relief (PCR) to respondent after an evidentiary hearing. We granted petitioner’s (the State’s) petition for a writ of certiorari, and now reverse. 1

FACTS

Respondent, then a highway patrol trooper, stopped a motorist on October 25, 1991, for driving under the influence, third offense. He agreed to charge the motorist with DUI,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Dempsey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API