Oklahoma v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Chief Judge.
In these consolidated petitions for review, petitioners1 challenge a final rule promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act. The petitioners argue that the EPA impermissibly rejected Oklahoma’s plan to limit the emissions of sulfur dioxide at Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company power plants and replaced it with its own more stringent regulations, which petitioners contend usurped the state’s authority and will require sizable expenditures on unnecessary technology. We conclude that the EPA has authority to review the state’s plan…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Texas v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Sierra Club v. EPACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- North Dakota v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Wildearth Guardians v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- WildEarth Guardians v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.