Legal Opinion

Wildearth Guardians v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 23, 2014No. 13-9524PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

On August 24, 2012, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated a final Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to reduce regional haze by regulating emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) at the five units of the Four Corners Power Plant (the Plant) on the Navajo Reservation in northwestern New Mexico. 1 WildEarth Guardians (WildEarth) filed a petition under 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1) for review of the FIP. It argued that promulgation of the FIP did not comply with the Endangered Species Act (ESA) because the EPA failed to consult with the Fish…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Bronson v. SwensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Home Loan Investment Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  5. Kansas Natural Resource v. United States Dept of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API