Legal Opinion

State v. Simanton

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1935No. 7,404PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The defendant, William Simanton, has appealed from a judgment of conviction of the crime of grand larceny on which he was sentenced to serve one year in the state prison, and from an order denying him a new trial.

The charge was the larceny of one “mouse-colored iron gray mare,” the property of Joseph Le Carno. The appeal challenges the correctness of the court’s rulings on the admission of testimony as to, other like offenses, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and- judgment, and certain instructions given by the court.

The evidence on behalf of the state sufficiently…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Waldron v. WaldronSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Graham v. RolandsonMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State v. HeineMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. StoutCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. State v. MerrittMontana Supreme Court · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API