Legal Opinion · Dissent

Interstate Excavating, Inc. v. Agla Development Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1980No. 16599Published

1DissentHall, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

In denying defendant’s motion to vacate judgment, the trial court was applying a specific statutory standard: “On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may in the furtherance of justice relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; . .”1 It is not to be questioned that the policy of the law favors the granting of *372such relief in the case of a default judgment 2 and that the remedy should be liberally administered in order to grant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Paul W. Larsen Contractor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Mayhew v. Standard Gilsonite CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Usery v. Weiner Bros.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API