Legal Opinion

Francis H. TUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXACO INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 22, 1998No. Docket 97-9262PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff pro se Francis H. Tung appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles L. Brieant, Judge, dismissing his complaint alleging that defendant Texaco Incorporated (“Texaco”), in implementing a reduction in force, violated his rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1994), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994). The district court granted summary judgment on the ground that Tung had signed a release of his rights…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Bormann v. AT&T Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bormann v. AT & T Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brenda K. Woodman v. Wwor-Tv, Inc., News America, Inc., and Fox Television Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Ruehl v. Viacom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. Powell v. OmnicomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Dr. William Hodge v. The New York College of Podiatric MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Frommert v. ConkrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API