American Oil Co. v. School District
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Crumlish, J.,
September 1, 1954. — I am compelled to dissent from the order of my colleagues for the following reasons:
First, the record does not warrant an adjudication on the pleadings.
The School District of Philadelphia and Add B. Anderson, secretary, etc., defendants, hereinafter referred to as school district, aver affirmatively in the twelfth paragraph of their answer “On the contrary, it is averred that the purpose of the acquisition of land X by the School District of Philadelphia is to exchange it for land S in order to construct a school building on land S if such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Broido v. KinnemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Heilman v. Lebanon & Annville Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Haldeman v. Pennsylvania Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.