Broido v. Kinneman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
This appeal is from an order sustaining preliminary objections filed by the plaintiffs to the defendants’ counterclaim in an action of assumpsit. Although the appellees made no point of it, a question as to the appealability of such an order was raised at. bar, a final judgment on the merits of the plaintiffs’ claim and the defense thereto not yet having been entered.
The order is appealable nonetheless. Its intendment and effect was to put the defendants out of court so far as their counterclaim was concerned. To that extent the order was final and would, no doubt,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Riling v. IdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Gordon v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Adcox v. PA. MFGRS'ASSN. CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.