Legal Opinion

New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. Erie R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 2, 1952No. 22325_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. .

The No. 133 was in good condition when she was moored outside the string of five barges in the slip and when the Waverly’s captain ran that tug’s engines at half speed to clear out the ice he knew there was danger from hard ice between the barges. He could, and should, have seen that the barges were being rocked together by the agitation of the water he caused and, indeed, as his tug left the slip after its engines had been worked for three quarters of an hour the No. 133 was seen by a deck hand to be so low in the water that she was in trouble. Her master was in the pilot house…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. The Southern CrossDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. the SS BeatriceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Great American Insurance v. Tugs "Cissi Reinauer"District Court, S.D. New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API