Legal Opinion

Norberg v. Norberg

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2017No. 20160098PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sandstrom, Surrogate Judge.

[¶ 1] Jon Norberg appeals the district court order denying his motion for judgment as a matter of law or new trial. He argues collateral estoppel established as a matter of law Alonna Knorr Norberg’s (“Knorr’s”) liability for his abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and defamation claims, and it should not have been redecided by the jury. He further argues Knorr’s dismissal of her lawsuit prevented her from raising affirmative defenses to his claims. Concluding collateral estoppel precluded relitigation of matters previously determined, we reverse and remand for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kummer v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Graham v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fahey v. CookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Great Plains Royalty Corporation v. Earl Schwartz CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Fahey v. CookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Killoran, et al. v. KalerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Northstar Center v. Lukenbill Family Partnership, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API