Legal Opinion

Smith v. Walter C. Best, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 5, 1990No. 90-3077PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.

In this products liability action, we are asked to review the district court’s determination that Ohio law does not recognize a cause of action based upon strict liability for failure to warn and to examine the district court’s evaluation of the sophisticated purchaser defense in the context of negligent failure to warn.

Recent Ohio case law establishes the viability of a claim based upon strict liability for failure to warn; the standard governing the manufacturer’s duty under this theory is identical to that applicable in cases alleging negligent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  3. Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Betty Adams, Joseph Adams v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. BalbosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Taylor v. American Chemistry CouncilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Ramsey v. Georgia Southern University Advanced Development CtrSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  5. Evelyn Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API