Legal Opinion
Arnold v. United States Postal Service
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 9, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-2571, 86-2291PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court are defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment and defendant’s motion to strike. After thoroughly considering the record in this case, the Court holds that defendant’s motion to dismiss must be treated as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and that plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment is denied and that defendant’s motion to strike is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gray v. York Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Gray v. York Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Clyde J. Arnold, Jr. v. United States Postal Service, Charles Ray Netherton, as Class Agent v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Arnold v. Postmaster GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Williams v. PryorDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.