Legal Opinion

Burns v. Alderman

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1992No. 19164PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This ease arises from a dispute over the rights of Peggy and Donald Alderman, Jr., (the Aldermans) to use a private roadway running through a real estate subdivision. The Aldermans own a lot in the subdivision, but use the roadway to access another parcel located adjacent to, but outside of, the subdivision. O’Neal and Isabelle Burns, who also own property within the subdivision, filed this action seeking to enjoin the Aldermans from using the roadway, alleging that the Aldermans’ activities constituted a misuse of the easement rights granted to the subdivision’s lot…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Haman v. FoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Benninger v. DerifieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API