Legal Opinion
State v. Mitchell
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBirdzell, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment convicting the defendant of keeping and maintaining a nuisance. A number of errors are assigned, but, inasmuch as the record clearly shows a mistrial in the matter of the instructions to the jury, it will not be necessary to refer to any of the other assignments.
The certified transcript contains the following:
“Counsel having finished argument to the jury, the attorney for the defendant being present at all times and making no objection or suggestion and the court overlooking the obtaining of consent to the giving of an oral charge, the following oral charge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Gile v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1867
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LambNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Ferderer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. MyersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Ackerman v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.