Legal Opinion

Hendrick v. Hendrick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 34,105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The parties are husband and wife. They have no children except a girl three years old whom they adopted.

The plaintiff’s bill for divorce charges cruelty, chiefly that defendant consorted with other men. Defendant filed answer and croSs-bill charging nonsupport.

Defendant had decree awarding her divorce, custody of the child, and a small periodical allowance, four dollars a week, toward support of herself and child. Plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff alone made case for divorce. The record is persuasive that defendant, in attending dances with other men, in riding with and consorting with them,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eistedt v. EistedtMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Carlson v. CarlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Burk v. BurkMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bearinger v. BearingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swift v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Farley v. FarleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Barnhart v. BarnhartConnecticut Superior Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API