Legal Opinion
Flanagan v. Benson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 31, 1929No. 8694PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
THs action was brought by ~W. D. Benson claiming to be the assignee of certain promissory notes, against the makers W. E. Campbell and Jack Haight, to recover the amount of the notes.
J. P. Flanagan, the appellant, was allowed to intervene, and filed a petition in intervention under a statute of Arkansas allowing interventions in actions at law (see Gunnells v. Latta, 86 Ark. 304, 111 S. W. 273; Choctaw O. & G. R. Co. v. McConnell, 74 Ark. 54, 84 S. W. 1043), and in his intervening petition he alleged the recovery of a judgment for about $41,000 in the district court of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Preston v. PratherSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- England v. GebhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Chicago Great Western R. v. ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Canal & Claiborne Streets Railroad v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schmidt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Champlin Refining Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Desha County v. Crocker First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Krause v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Momand v. Paramount Publix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.