Legal Opinion
Champlin Refining Co. v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 23, 1937No. 1541PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries to George Colvard, a minor, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the Champlin Refining Company. The action was commenced by a next friend. Prior to the trial Thomas was appointed as guardian ad litem for Colvard and was substituted as party plaintiff.
At the close of the evidence the Champlin Company moved for a directed verdict in its favor. The motion was denied. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Colvard and judgment was entered thereon. The Champlin Company has appealed.
The evidence viewed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Larson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- In re BowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Offensend v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steinhauser v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc. Ltd. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- L. E. Whitham Constr. Co. v. RemerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Steinhauser v. Hertz CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.