Legal Opinion

Tritico v. Texas Liquor Control Board

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1939No. 3400PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Justice.

Appellants made application for renewal of their package store permit to sell liquor at retail in unbroken packages at their place of business in the City of Port Arthur. The permit was refused because the store was located within territory of the city of Port Arthur which had been declared a dry area by amendment to the city charter. By this action appellants sought a mandamus to compel the administrator of the Texas Liquor Control Board to issue the permit. Plaintiffs fully plead their case and alleged facts which entitled them to the permit provided the charter provision in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. City of San Antonio v. FetzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. City of New Braunfels v. WaldschmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Le Gois v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eckert v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Louder v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. City of Clute v. LinscombCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Discount Liquors No. 2, Inc. v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. City of Dallas v. HaworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API