Eckert v. Jacobs
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BAUGH, Justice.
Appellees, as plaintiffs below, sued to enjoin the City of Austin, and its named officers, from interfering with the sale of beer and wine by Jacobs at and upon his place of business at 1816 San Jacinto Street. After a hearing, a temporary injunction was granted as prayed for; hence this appeal.
While Jacobs, as tenant, was joined in this suit by the owner of the property, he is the party primarily interested and will be referred to as appellee. And for convenience the appellants will be referred to as the City.
The suit involves the validity, and application to appellee, of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- West Texas Coaches, Inc. v. MadiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dallas Merchant's & Concessionaire's Ass'n v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Borough of Fanwood v. RoccoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Auditorium, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- T & R Associates., Inc. v. City of Amarillo, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985
- Limon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.