Legal Opinion

Tractor Supply Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1977No. 76-1129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

R. C. 5739.03(B) reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

*277“If any sale is claimed to be exempt under division (E) of Section 5739.01 of the Revised Code or under Section 5739.02 of the Revised Code, with the exception of divisions (B)(1) to (B)(ll) * * * the consumer must furnish to the vendor, and the vendor must obtain from the consumer, a certificate specifying the reason that the sale is not legally subject to the tax. * * * The certificate shall be in such form as the Tax Commissioner by regulation prescribes. If no certificate is furnished or obtained within the period for filing the return…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stotts-Friedman Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Chemetron Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Jemo Associates, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Jemo Associates, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API