Legal Opinion

Bay Lumber Co. v. Pickering

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1932No. Docket No. 4482PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

Action to foreclose a material-man’s lien. Appellants are the owners, and the defense interposed by them was that of payment.

From a judgment and decree in favor of plaintiffs the appeal is prosecuted.

The ease is presented for review on a stipulation of facts, settled as a bill of exceptions. The facts thus stipulated follow:

“That on the 14th day of September, 1926, defendants Leonard G. Sills and Luella G. Sills as owners of the property described in plaintiff’s complaint entered into a contract with defendant L. M. Pickering as contractor, whereby the contractor agreed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schallert-Ganahl Lumber Co. v. NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. S. W. Towle Lumber Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nolte v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Herrman v. DaffinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Hollywood Wholesale Electric Co. v. John Baskin, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. National Surety Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Utah State Building Commission Ex Rel. Mountain States Supply Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API