Legal Opinion

Herrman v. Daffin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1957No. 7543PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Judge.

This case arises out of the fact that an owner (Daifin) paid his contractors (Altman and Gibson Construction Company) the balance on construction price of a residence. The contractors in turn paid a portion of the money to their materialmen (Herrman Lumber Company, a partnership), who applied such payment to other,' and older, indebtedness due them from the contractors, thus leaving exposed and unpaid their debt for the materials which went into the Daifin house. Later the material-men filed suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on this house.

At a pretrial conference a special jury…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. R. P. Farnsworth & Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  2. Webb v. Crane Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Ittner v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. McKaig v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1953

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Wells v. GoforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. United States of America for the Use of Dakota Electric Supply Company, Anorth Dakota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  5. Haynes v. LinderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API