Legal Opinion

United States v. Singh

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2004No. 02-30368, 02-30392, 02-30397, 03-30068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Elvis Anthony Ruben Singh (“Singh”), Gabriele Koenig (“Koenig”),1 James Dennis Evans (“Evans”), and Bernard Quarles (“Quarles”) appeal their various convictions and sentences for distribution and possession of cocaine base. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm each defendant’s conviction and sentence.2

*515 I. Common Claims

Singh, Koenig, and Evans each challenge the district court’s joinder of, and subsequent refusal to sever, their trials.

A Joinder

The district court did not err in joining Singh, Koenig, and Evans for trial. All three defendants were accused of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Joan McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API