Legal Opinion

United States v. Lopez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 29, 2008No. 07-35389PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed July 16, 2008, is amended as follows:

At Slip Op. 8785, line 34: Change “Counsel for one of the co-defendants told ...” to “Frank Cikutovich, counsel for one of the co-defendants, told ... ”.

At Slip Op. 8786, line 24: Change “Bailey to Agent Rice or ...” to “Bailey to Rice or ... ”.

At Slip Op. 8792 [4], line 1: Amend to read “In this case, because Lopez cannot carry the lesser burden of establishing a Brady violation that would entitle Lopez to habeas relief, had this been Lopez’s first habeas petition, she cannot carry the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Van Hoosen v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API