Legal Opinion
Thales Visionix, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 20, 2015No. 14-513CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Patent Infringement Claim; Helmet-Mounted Display System; F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft; Motion Tracking Technology; 35 U.S.C. § 101; Patent Eligibility Analysis.
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
WHEELER, Judge.
Plaintiff Thales Visionix, Inc. (“TVI”) is a Maryland corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Thales Defense & Security, Inc. TVI designs and develops helmet-mounted display and motion-tracking technology for defense and aerospace applications. TVI brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1498 alleging the unlicensed and unlawful use by the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thales Visionix Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Sunoco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Polaris Innovations Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Thales Visionix, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020