Polaris Innovations Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Polaris Innovations Limited filed suit against defendant Kingston Technology Company, Inc. on the basis that a Kingston-produced computer memory card—model number KVR16R11D4/16— infringes on two Polaris patents, U.S. Patent No. 6,850,414 (the 414 Patent) and U.S. Patent No. 7,315,454 (the 454 Patent). Count III of Polaris’s Complaint asserts infringement of the 414 Patent and Count V of the Complaint asserts infringement of the 454 Patent. (Dkt.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Immersion Corp. v. Fitbit, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc. v. Laudando & Assoc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025