Horton v. Horton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Plaintiffs commenced an action to quiet title to certain real property, the complaint being in the usual short form under section 738 of the Code of Civil Procedure, alleging ownership and possession in plaintiffs, and that defendants, without right, claimed an adverse interest.
The amended answer of defendants admitted plaintiffs’ ownership and possession, subject to defendants’ rights of ownership and possession as established by deeds from plaintiff B. F. Horton to F. A. Horton, copies of said deeds being appended as exhibits to the answer. Said answer admitted that defendants claimed an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Farrar v. SteenberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Robinson v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Burris v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Aalwyn's Law Institute v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Berry v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gantner v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Cranston v. MendenhallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Huntington v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.