Legal Opinion
Biernacki v. Redevelopment Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 1, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1632 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
As part of the Wilkes-Barre Downtown Urban Renewal Project (Project), the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Wilkes-Barre in April 1974 filed a declaration of the taking of a property located at 98 South Franklin Street owned by John Biernacki and Alice, his wife. The Biernackis appealed an award made by a board of view and a traverse jury returned a verdict in their favor in the amount of $75,000. This amount was paid by the Authority, and the judgment entered on the verdict was satisfied of record on May 21, 1975.
Original plans for the Downtown Renewal Project…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Powell v. ShepardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Tigue v. BASALYGASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. AmbrosiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- In Re Condemnation by the CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by25 opinions
- Strasburg Scooters, LLC v. Strasburg Rail Rd., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Barren v. DubasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Fulton v. Bedford County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- LTM-7 Associates v. Clinton County Tax Claim BureauCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.