Miller v. Hartford Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
GADOLA, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff is not entitled to benefits under an insurance contract, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion and deny Plaintiffs motion.
II. Statement of Facts
Plaintiff, the husband of Barbara Miller, had an accidental death and dismemberment policy with defendant Hartford Life Insurance Company (“Hartford”). Under the policy, Hartford agreed to pay benefits if…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raymond v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Corum v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008
- Hawkins v. CUNA Mutual GroupDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023