Corum v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment Reversing Administrative Decision [DE #20]; the issues having been fully briefed, it is ripe for consideration. The question is whether Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”) acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it made an administrative determination that the estate of Charles Corum was not entitled to accidental death benefits under the terms of his ERISA policy.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The essential facts in this case are not in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Pens. Plan Guide P 23922q Juanita Yeager v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Daniel v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hawkins v. CUNA Mutual GroupDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023