Hansford v. Stone-Ordean-Wells Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Action by William A. Hansford against the Stone-Ordean-Wells Company." On motion to remand case to the state court.
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
This suit was removed hither for diverse citizenship, and plaintiff moves to remand (1) for that removal was not timely; (2) for that the statutory notice of contemplated removal is insufficient.
It appears that on September 28, 1912, summons from the state court was served on defendant. On October 17, 1912, and one day before defendant was required to answer or plead to the complaint, the parties by counsel stipulated and agreed in writing that day filed in the state court that defendant could have to and including October 28, 1912, within which to appear and demur,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3Cited by19 opinions
- Williams v. New York, P. & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Frazier v. HinesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1919
- Miller v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- Lee v. Continental Ins.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1923
- Macmillan Co. v. KingDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.