Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Hines

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided May 30, 1919No. 142PublishedCited by 21 opinions

At Raw. Action by Wesley Frazier against Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads, begun in state court and removed to the federal court. On motion to permit defendant to amend both petition for removal and answer.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, District Judge.

A motion has been made in this case, after due notice, to permit the defendant to amend both the- petition for removal and the answer herein, and counsel on both sides have appeared and been heard.

It appears from the record that the plaintiff, on the 10th day of March, 1919, .commenced an action in the court of common pleas for Jasper county, in the state of South Carolina, against the defendant,’ to recover damages for an alleged personal injury committed by the negligence of the employes of the defendant. Thereafter, and within the time allowed by law, the defendant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hanson v. PonderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Browne v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  3. Carlton Properties, Inc. v. Crescent City Leasing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Williams v. New York, P. & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  5. Gratz v. MurchisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API