Legal Opinion

Musgrave v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1952No. 7897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

By a policy of insurance dated June 28, 1947, the State Insurance Fund, hereinafter referred to as the Fund, insured the John F. Beasley Construction Company under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, covering liability to injured workmen of the insured. Other contingent liability of the John F. Beasley Construction Company was written by the Liberty Mutual Insurance .Company, hereinafter referred to as the Mutual Company.

At the time the Fund assumed liability to injured workmen under the Idaho Workmen’s Compensation Law, the Mutual was not qualified to write such insurance in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gratopp v. Carde Stamping & Tool Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Eurich v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. Southern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Amalgamated Casualty Ins. Co. v. WinslowCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  5. Cowles v. State Ins. FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Franklin Mortgage Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  2. Thompson v. Liberty National Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Neeman v. Otoe CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Chevron Oil Company v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. In Re HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API